ArticleLancet regional health. Americas2025
Effects of missed anti-tuberculosis therapy doses on treatment outcome: a multi-center cohort study.
Article in Lancet regional health. Americas, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hidden in Success: Gendered Patterns of Suboptimal Care Engagement Among Tuberculosis Patients Who "Successfully" Completed Treatment in South Africa.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2026Article
- Efficacy and immune-inflammatory modulation of combined glucocorticoid and anti-tuberculosis therapy in patients with bronchial asthma and pulmonary tuberculosis.American journal of translational research · 2026Article
- Prognostic significance of inflammatory and nutritional indicators for treatment outcomes in untreated tuberculosis patients with hypertension.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
- Hidden in Success: Gendered Patterns of Suboptimal Care Engagement Among TB Patients Who "Successfully" Completed Treatment in South Africa.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Tuberculosis (TB) remains a leading cause of infectious disease mortality globally. Although directly observed therapy (DOT) has been widely implemented to improve adherence, nonadherence continues to compromise treatment success rates, especially in real-world settings. Therefore, this study aims to assess the impact of missed doses on TB treatment outcomes. Methods: Prospective study that followed adults with drug-sensitive TB for two years after TB treatment initiation at five clinical centers of the RePORT-Brazil cohort between June 2015 and June 2019. Participants not in DOT or followed for less than 30 days were excluded. Nonadherence was defined as the percentage of missed doses relative to the prescribed regimen, monitored daily through DOT. The primary composite outcome comprised treatment failure, disease recurrence, drug resistance, death, or loss to follow-up (LTFU) after 30 days of treatment. Associations were assessed with multivariable logistic regression. Findings: Among the 578 participants analyzed, 218 (37·7%) experienced unfavorable outcomes. Overall, 23% of participants missed more than 10% of prescribed doses, and this group had an 81·2% likelihood of experiencing unfavorable outcomes, compared to only 21·6% among those with complete adherence. A significant association was observed between the percentage of missed doses and unfavorable outcomes (adjusted OR: 1·11, 95% CI: 1·07-1·14, p-value < 0·0001). Interpretation: Even minor nonadherence in TB treatment was associated with an increased risk of unfavorable outcomes, highlighting the role of adherence in successful TB care. Funding: Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Fundação José Silveira, Departamento de Ciência e Tecnologia, US National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.