Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40657291›Full record

ReviewPhytoKeys2025

Aquatic macrophytes of Angola: a preliminary verified checklist.

Rafael Somandjinga, Sílvia Quadros, Francisco Maiato, David Goyder

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in PhytoKeys, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Rafael SomandjingaCIBIO, Research Centre in Biodiversity and Genetic Resources, InBio Associate Laboratory, BIOPOLIS Program in Genomics, Biodiversity and Land Planning; UNESCO Chair - Land Within Sea: Biodiversity & Sustainability in Atlantic Islands, University of the Azores, Rua da Mãe de Deus, 9500-321 Ponta Delgada, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-4852-7703
Sílvia QuadrosCIBIO, Research Centre in Biodiversity and Genetic Resources, InBio Associate Laboratory, BIOPOLIS Program in Genomics, Biodiversity and Land Planning; UNESCO Chair - Land Within Sea: Biodiversity & Sustainability in Atlantic Islands, University of the Azores, Rua da Mãe de Deus, 9500-321 Ponta Delgada, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8562-6640
Francisco MaiatoFaculty of Natural Sciences, University of Namibe, Farol de Noronha Campus 274, Moçâmedes, Namibe, Angola.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8859-7491
David GoydercE3c - Centre for Ecology, Evolution and Environmental Changes, Faculty of Sciences, University of Lisbon, Lisboa, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3449-7313

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aquatic macrophytes are photosynthetic macroscopic organisms that grow permanently or periodically submerged or floating on the surface of the water. The aim of this study is to compile a checklist of fresh-water aquatic vascular plant macrophytes occurring in Angola, focusing on their origins, life forms, conservation status and distribution throughout the country. The checklist was compiled through a literature review of previous studies carried out in Angola, herbarium collections and online databases. A total of 526 species of macrophytes in 196 genera and 70 families was recorded. Cyperaceae was the most abundant family, followed by Poaceae, Lentibulariaceae, Lythraceae, Eriocaulaceae, Araceae, Podostemaceae, Hydrocharitaceae, Onagraceae and Plantaginaceae. The highest number of macrophytes was recorded from Huíla Province, followed by Moxico and Cuando Cubango Provinces, respectively, while Lunda Norte, Uíge and Zaire were poorly represented. From the aquatic macrophytes recorded, it was possible to identify the category of origin of 511 species. From these, 472 species are native, 23 introduced and 16 are endemic to Angola and the conservation status of these species was also assessed. The results obtained in this study show that there are still some gaps, especially with regard to the distribution of aquatic macrophytes in Angola, since many species are documented as native, but there is a lack of data on their distribution.

Indexed as

Angolaaquatic macrophytesconservation statusdistribution

Identifiers

PMID40657291
PMCPMC12254829

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.