ReviewTherapeutic advances in rare disease
Enhancing and leveraging principal investigator and patient advocacy group collaboration in rare disease clinical research-meeting report from the rare Diseases Clinical Research Network.
Review in Therapeutic advances in rare disease. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Emerging trends and research hot spots in inborn error of immunity: A bibliometric perspective.The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global · 2026Article
- Collaboration as a Catalyst for Advancing Rare Disease Research: The Experience of the Rare Diseases Clinical Research Network.Clinical and translational science · 2026Review
- A hierarchical and configurational analysis of Health Technology Assessment outcomes for cell and gene therapies.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Rare Diseases Clinical Research Network (RDCRN) works toward faster diagnosis and better treatment for people living with rare diseases, specifically by advancing clinical trial readiness. Inclusion of patient advocacy groups (PAGs) is mandated for each RDCRN consortia; principal investigator (PI)-PAG collaboration is expected to accelerate clinical trial readiness. Real-world examples of PI-PAG collaboration in rare disease clinical research (RDCR) are often not documented nor shared. We report on the Spring 2023 RDCRN meeting, which was dedicated to (a) capturing examples of ways that PAGs and PIs in the RDCRN collaborate, and (b) describing challenges and potential best practices for PAG-PI collaboration. PI and PAG attendees included 50 investigators and staff from 19 consortia and 41 PAG members from 21 consortia. Examples of collaboration in Study Design, Planning and Execution, Funding, and Stakeholder Engagement were captured, as were best practices and challenges to PI-PAG collaboration. Strengthening PI-PAG collaboration can accelerate rare disease research. Documenting real-world examples, and barriers and facilitators of collaboration, from across the RDCRN, supports existing frameworks for accelerating clinical trial readiness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.