ArticleGlobal advances in integrative medicine and health
Complementary and Integrative Health Therapies and Pain: Delivery Through Veterans Affairs and Community Care.
Article in Global advances in integrative medicine and health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Complementary and Integrative Health (CIH) services are a national priority for the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) healthcare system and can be effective in reducing chronic pain. Eligible VA patients can receive their CIH care through a VA clinic, or through community care (CC) funded by the VA. The present study compares the effectiveness of 3 CIH services (acupuncture, chiropractic, and medical massage therapy) delivered in direct care by VA vs CC providers at improving veterans' chronic pain. Methods: Data were analyzed from the Complementary and Integrative Health Therapy Patient Experience Survey, a longitudinal, self-administered survey of CIH use and health outcomes. Mixed models were used to evaluate the relationship of higher CIH therapy visits delivered by the VA vs CC with pain interference and pain severity, using both raw counts of visits and clinically meaningful groupings of visits. Results: Among veterans with chronic pain who engaged in CIH services, more CIH visits were associated with lower levels of pain severity and pain interference. VA acupuncture and chiropractic had a stronger beneficial relationship with pain than CC acupuncture and chiropractic, while CC medical massage therapy had a stronger beneficial relationship than VA medical massage. Conclusions: CIH therapies delivered through the VA and through CC both offer potentially effective means of reducing chronic pain. Some therapies may be more effective when delivered through the VA vs CC, or may indicate lack of full implementation, but the limitations of observational data preclude any causal statements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.