ArticleIndian journal of orthopaedics2025
A Prospective Observational Case-Control Study on Bone Mineral Density in Asian-Indians With and Without Femoral Neck Fragility Fractures and Delineation of Fracture Thresholds.
Article in Indian journal of orthopaedics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Prevalence of osteoporosis in healthy adult males in India measured by dual-energy-X-ray absorptiometry: A systematic review and meta-analysis.The Indian journal of medical research · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The present study aims to compare bone mineral density (BMD) between adults with femoral neck (FN) fragility fractures and an equal number of age- and sex-matched healthy controls and delineate sex-specific BMD cut-offs that could predict FN fragility fractures. Materials and Methods: Adult patients with FN fragility fractures admitted at our institution between January 2017 and December 2018 were enrolled. Patients with secondary causes of osteoporosis were excluded. Eligible patients underwent measurement of BMD using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. As controls, we selected age- and sex-matched healthy North Indian adults without any history of fractures from the Chandigarh Urban Bone Epidemiological Study (CUBES). Results: After exclusion, 120 cases (mean age = 67.1 ± 10.1 years) with FN fragility fractures were included (women n = 61). An equal number of age-, sex- and ethnicity-matched healthy controls (n = 120) were selected from CUBES. Controls had significantly higher BMD at both FN and lumbar spine (L1-L4) than cases. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis showed that in women, FN BMD ≤ 0.680 gm/cm Conclusions: Adults with FN fragility fractures have lower BMD than age- and sex-matched healthy controls. Although specific BMD thresholds predicting fragility fractures are forthcoming with relatively good sensitivities, they have low specificities thereby possibly limiting their use in routine clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.