Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40657207›Full record

ArticleMethodsX2025

Current understanding and theories of wellbeing washing in the context of workplace health and wellbeing: A scoping review protocol.

Éadaoin Ryan, Niamh Imbusch, Mary Kinahan, Róisín Guilfoyle

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in MethodsX, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Éadaoin RyanSchool of Management, People and Organisations, Faculty of Business, Technological University Dublin, Aungier Street, Dublin 2 D02 HW71, Ireland.
Niamh ImbuschSchool of Management, People and Organisations, Faculty of Business, Technological University Dublin, Aungier Street, Dublin 2 D02 HW71, Ireland.
Mary KinahanSchool of Business, Maynooth University, Maynooth, Co. Kildare, Ireland.
Róisín GuilfoyleLibrary Services, Technological University Dublin, Park House, Grangegorman, Dublin 7 D07 EWV4, Ireland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Workplace health and wellbeing practitioners have recently voiced concerns regarding the emerging concept of wellbeing washing (WW). While practitioner literature extensively discusses this concept, research supporting the examination of it and offering solutions is lacking. This scoping review protocol outlines a means of comprehensively investigating and mapping the mainly practitioner-authored literature on WW, to support the establishment of a working definition and deeper understanding of this concept, which will inform future research. A search strategy will be employed to map information from diverse practitioner literature sources. Guided by the JBI Scoping Review Framework, two reviewers will use predefined criteria to independently screen included sources and capture information using a standardized data extraction tool. A basic qualitative content analysis will be conducted and results presented in tabular form. A narrative summary will complement the tabulated results, providing further context.•The scoping review will identify, map, and synthesize existing literature on the emerging concept of WW.•The JBI Scoping Review Framework and PRISMA-ScR reporting tool will be employed, to ensure a methodical and systematic approach.•The outcomes aim to support the establishment of a working definition and provide deeper understanding of WW to inform future research.

Indexed as

Scoping Framework for Emerging Concepts in Practitioner Literature.Scoping reviewWellbeing washingWellwashingWorkplace wellbeing

Identifiers

PMID40657207
PMCPMC12246924

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.