ArticleMethodsX2025
Current understanding and theories of wellbeing washing in the context of workplace health and wellbeing: A scoping review protocol.
Article in MethodsX, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The impact of mental health lived experience advocacy on youth education and employment engagement.Discover mental health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Workplace health and wellbeing practitioners have recently voiced concerns regarding the emerging concept of wellbeing washing (WW). While practitioner literature extensively discusses this concept, research supporting the examination of it and offering solutions is lacking. This scoping review protocol outlines a means of comprehensively investigating and mapping the mainly practitioner-authored literature on WW, to support the establishment of a working definition and deeper understanding of this concept, which will inform future research. A search strategy will be employed to map information from diverse practitioner literature sources. Guided by the JBI Scoping Review Framework, two reviewers will use predefined criteria to independently screen included sources and capture information using a standardized data extraction tool. A basic qualitative content analysis will be conducted and results presented in tabular form. A narrative summary will complement the tabulated results, providing further context.•The scoping review will identify, map, and synthesize existing literature on the emerging concept of WW.•The JBI Scoping Review Framework and PRISMA-ScR reporting tool will be employed, to ensure a methodical and systematic approach.•The outcomes aim to support the establishment of a working definition and provide deeper understanding of WW to inform future research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.