ArticleIndian journal of anaesthesia2025
Association of frailty with postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing elective non-malignant abdominal surgeries under general or neuraxial anaesthesia: A prospective observational cohort study.
Article in Indian journal of anaesthesia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparison of effectiveness and safety of spinal anaesthesia with 0.25% versus 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine for endoscopic urological procedures: A prospective randomised controlled trial.Indian journal of anaesthesia · 2026Article
- Response to comments on "Association of frailty with postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing elective non-malignant abdominal surgeries under general or neuraxial anaesthesia".Indian journal of anaesthesia · 2025Article
- Comment on "Association of frailty with postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing elective non-malignant abdominal surgeries under general or neuraxial anaesthesia".Indian journal of anaesthesia · 2025Article
- Comment on the interpretation of odds ratios in "association of frailty with postoperative outcomes".Indian journal of anaesthesia · 2025Article
- Response to the "Comment on the interpretation of odds ratios in 'association of frailty with postoperative outcomes'".Indian journal of anaesthesia · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aims: Modified frailty index (mFI) is a valuable tool for predicting postoperative complications (POCs). We aimed to determine the association of frailty using mFI and the technique of anaesthesia, with POCs as the primary outcomes in patients undergoing non-malignant abdominal surgeries under general or neuraxial anaesthesia. Methods: After ethical approval, 125 patients of either gender, aged ≥18 years and scheduled to undergo general or neuraxial anaesthesia were enroled. Preoperatively, the mFI score was calculated for all the patients. Patients with mFI ≥0.27 were considered 'significantly frail'. The patients were followed up from the immediate postoperative period to 30 days after surgery, and POCs as per the Clavien-Dindo (CD) classification during their hospital stay were recorded. After discharge, patients were followed up telephonically every 15 days within 30 days to monitor for readmission or mortality. Results: The sensitivity and specificity of the mFI score to predict major POC were 86.11% and 88.76%, respectively, with a high negative predictive value of 94.05%. In mFI scores ≤0.27 and ≥0.27, the odds of POC were 1.74 and 2.33 times higher with general anaesthesia than with neuraxial anaesthesia, respectively. In mFI ≥0.27, the odds of 30-day readmission were 29.04 (95% confidence interval: 6.26, 34.68) with a longer hospital stay ( Conclusion: Higher mFI scores consistently predict more severe postoperative complications, particularly in CD grades II and IV and intensive care unit. The anaesthesia technique showed no significant association with postoperative complications, except in the higher mFI group.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.