ArticleIndian journal of anaesthesia2025
Economic and geographical disparities in global contribution to open access publishing in anaesthesiology: A bibliometric analysis.
Article in Indian journal of anaesthesia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Assessing open access publishing in anaesthesia.Indian journal of anaesthesia · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aims: Open access (OA) publishing improved the reach of scientific discoveries, particularly among researchers in lower-income countries. However, OA publishing still has a global imbalance. This bibliometric analysis evaluates anaesthesia OA journals to explore geographical and economic disparities in publication volume. Methods: We queried the Directory of Open Access Journals for OA anaesthesia-related journals between 2014 and 2024. Data from the included journals were analysed using Scopus, from which we extracted the year of publication and the corresponding author's affiliation. Additional metrics were obtained from each journal website. Countries were then categorised by income level and geographical region. Results: Thirty-four anaesthesiology OA journals were analysed, encompassing 27,634 publications from 120 countries. The leading contributors were India (23.96%), the USA (14.98%) and China (6.54%). Low-income countries accounted for 0.37% of total publications, followed by upper-middle-income (17.97%), lower-middle-income (29.07%), and high-income (52.54%) countries. The geographical distribution of publication volume was as follows: Southeast Asia (25.38%), Europe (23.18%), Western Pacific (18.92%), Americas (23.91%), Eastern Mediterranean (8.03%) and Africa (0.59%). Nineteen journals required a mean article processing charge (APC) of US $2,164.89, accounting for 51.89% of the total publications. India ranked first in non-APC journals, while the USA led in APC journals. Conclusion: While OA publishing enhances accessibility for readers, it still presents challenges for authors, particularly in economically disadvantaged countries. Significant geographical and economic disparities exist in OA publication volume, likely due to limited investment and structural barriers in lower-income countries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.