ArticleIndian journal of anaesthesia2025
Comparison between microcuff and wire-reinforced endotracheal tubes on postoperative complications in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: A randomised study.
Article in Indian journal of anaesthesia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Symptom clusters and symptom network analysis of patients after anterior cervical spine surgery: a cross-sectional study.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aims: This randomised study investigated whether microcuff endotracheal tubes (ETT) reduce postoperative complications compared to wire-reinforced ETT in patients undergoing anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). Methods: In total, 120 patients were randomly assigned to receive either a microcuff ETT (Group M) or a wire-reinforced ETT (Group W) during surgery. Intraoperative cuff pressure changes due to retractor use were noted. Postoperative complications such as vocal cord palsy and airway oedema were observed at extubation, and hoarseness, sore throat, dysphagia, and stridor were assessed at 6, 24, and 48 hours after extubation. Data were analysed using SPSS v. 24 software. The sample size was calculated from a study based on the primary outcome, which is hoarseness of voice, to detect a 16% difference between the two groups, with 80% power and a significance level of Results: Both groups had similar baseline characteristics. The initial and post-retraction cuff inflation volumes were significantly lower in Group M. Cuff pressure increased significantly after retractor use in both groups ( Conclusion: Microcuff ETT may offer advantages over wire-reinforced ETT during ACDF by potentially reducing the incidence of hoarseness, likely due to lower cuff pressure with preserved tracheal mucosal perfusion, and requiring less readjustment of the cuff after retractor application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.