Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40657142›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of anaesthesia2025

Comparison between microcuff and wire-reinforced endotracheal tubes on postoperative complications in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: A randomised study.

S R Janani, Dheeraj Masapu, D N Dhananjay, Satish Rudrappa, Ramachandran Govindasamy, T Jagadish

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of anaesthesia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

S R JananiDepartment of Neuroanaesthesia and Neurocritical Care, National Institute of Mental Health and Neuro Science (NIMHANS), Bangalore, Karnataka, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-6130-3684
Dheeraj MasapuDivision of Neuroanaesthesia, Aster International Institute of Neurosciences and Spine Care, Aster Whitefield Hospital, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9209-1023
D N DhananjayDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Sakra World Hospital, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-1903-6333
Satish RudrappaDivision of Neuro and Spine Surgery, Aster International Institute of Neurosciences and Spine Care, Aster Whitefield Hospital, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1106-4371
Ramachandran GovindasamyDivision of Neuro and Spine Surgery, Aster International Institute of Neurosciences and Spine Care, Aster Whitefield Hospital, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3250-0029
T JagadishDivision of Neuro and Spine Surgery, Aster International Institute of Neurosciences and Spine Care, Aster Whitefield Hospital, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-3516-2090

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Aims: This randomised study investigated whether microcuff endotracheal tubes (ETT) reduce postoperative complications compared to wire-reinforced ETT in patients undergoing anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). Methods: In total, 120 patients were randomly assigned to receive either a microcuff ETT (Group M) or a wire-reinforced ETT (Group W) during surgery. Intraoperative cuff pressure changes due to retractor use were noted. Postoperative complications such as vocal cord palsy and airway oedema were observed at extubation, and hoarseness, sore throat, dysphagia, and stridor were assessed at 6, 24, and 48 hours after extubation. Data were analysed using SPSS v. 24 software. The sample size was calculated from a study based on the primary outcome, which is hoarseness of voice, to detect a 16% difference between the two groups, with 80% power and a significance level of Results: Both groups had similar baseline characteristics. The initial and post-retraction cuff inflation volumes were significantly lower in Group M. Cuff pressure increased significantly after retractor use in both groups ( Conclusion: Microcuff ETT may offer advantages over wire-reinforced ETT during ACDF by potentially reducing the incidence of hoarseness, likely due to lower cuff pressure with preserved tracheal mucosal perfusion, and requiring less readjustment of the cuff after retractor application.

Indexed as

Anterior cervical discectomy and fusioncuff pressureendotracheal tubeflexometallichoarseness of voicemicrocuffspine surgeryvocal cord palsywire-reinforced

Identifiers

PMID40657142
PMCPMC12244448

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.