Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40657141›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of anaesthesia2025

Comparative efficacy of different doses of dexmedetomidine in sedation during awake fibreoptic nasotracheal intubation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Mohd Ovais Alam, Nishaant Ramasamy, Gowtham Kannan, Mogan Kaviprawin, Bijaya Kumar Padhi, Aravind P Gandhi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of anaesthesia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mohd Ovais Alam *MBBS, Amar Shaheed Jodha Singh Ataiyya Thakur Darion Singh Medical College, Fatehpur, Uttar Pradesh, India.ORCID 0009-0007-3063-9963
Nishaant Ramasamy *Department of Community Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), Nagpur, Maharashtra, India.ORCID 0009-0003-3141-6316
Gowtham KannanDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-9512-3270
Mogan KaviprawinEpidemiology Department, South Asia Field Epidemiology and Technology Network, Inc. (SAFETYNET), Chandigarh, India.ORCID 0000-0002-1659-059X
Bijaya Kumar PadhiDepartment of Community Medicine and School of Public Health, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India.ORCID 0000-0002-2828-2375
Aravind P GandhiDepartment of Community Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), Nagpur, Maharashtra, India.ORCID 0000-0003-3898-5450

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Aims: Awake fibreoptic nasotracheal intubation (AFONI) is critical in patients with difficult airways, requiring effective sedation that preserves spontaneous ventilation and airway reflexes. This systematic review evaluated the comparative efficacy of various dexmedetomidine doses in sedation for AFONI, with a meta-analysis focusing on 0.5, 1, and 1.5 µg/kg doses. Methods: Databases searched included PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane, initially up to 5 May 2024, with a top-up search on 15 April 2025. Five studies were systematically reviewed, covering dexmedetomidine doses of 0.5, 0.7, 1, 1.5, and 2 µg/kg. A meta-analysis was conducted on two studies with doses of 1 and 1.5 µg/kg, and two studies with doses of 0.5 and 1.5 µg/kg. Primary outcomes included patient comfort, intubation scores, and sedation levels; secondary outcomes included vocal cord function, cough, and limb movements. Continuous and dichotomous outcome variables were summarised as mean difference and risk ratio, with a 95% confidence interval, using RStudio 2024.12.0 (PROSPERO ID: CRD42024541481). Results: Meta-analysis showed that 1.5 µg/kg did not significantly improve patient comfort or intubation conditions compared to 1 and 0.5 µg/kg. No significant differences were observed in intubation comfort scores, sedation levels, or patient satisfaction across the various doses. Conclusions: Dexmedetomidine at 0.5 and 1 µg/kg offers effective sedation and patient comfort comparable to 1.5 µg/kg during AFONI. Given the very low to moderate certainty of evidence, further large-scale studies are warranted to establish optimal dosing for enhanced patient experience and reduced side effects across various clinical settings.

Indexed as

Airwayawake intubationconscious sedationdexmedetomidinedosesintubationpatient comfortpatient satisfactionsystematic review

Identifiers

PMID40657141
PMCPMC12244460

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.