Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40657135›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. CHI Conference2024

Sketching AI Concepts with Capabilities and Examples: AI Innovation in the Intensive Care Unit.

Nur Yildirim, Susanna Zlotnikov, Deniz Sayar, Jeremy M Kahn, Leigh A Bukowski, Sher Shah Amin, Kathryn A Riman, Billie S Davis, John S Minturn, Andrew J King and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. CHI Conference, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Intelligent Reasoning Cues: A Framework and Case Study of the Roles of AI Information in Complex Decisions.Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. CHI Conference · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Investigating Why Clinicians Deviate from Standards of Care: Liberating Patients from Mechanical Ventilation in the ICU.Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. CHI Conference · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Nur YildirimCarnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Susanna ZlotnikovCarnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Deniz SayarIzmir University of Economics, Izmir, Turkey.
Jeremy M KahnUniversity of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Leigh A BukowskiUniversity of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Sher Shah AminUniversity of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Kathryn A RimanUniversity of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Billie S DavisUniversity of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
John S MinturnUniversity of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Andrew J KingUniversity of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Dan RickettsUniversity of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Lu TangUniversity of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Venkatesh SivaramanCarnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Adam PererCarnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Sarah M PreumDartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA.
James McCannCarnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
John ZimmermanCarnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.

Funding

Organizational strategies for improving evidence-uptake in intensive careR35HL144804 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI KAHN, JEREMY M · 2019 to 2025
$6.6M
NHLBI NIH HHS R35 HL144804
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Advances in artificial intelligence (AI) have enabled unprecedented capabilities, yet innovation teams struggle when envisioning AI concepts. Data science teams think of innovations users do not want, while domain experts think of innovations that cannot be built. A lack of effective ideation seems to be a breakdown point. How might multidisciplinary teams identify buildable and desirable use cases? This paper presents a first hand account of ideating AI concepts to improve critical care medicine. As a team of data scientists, clinicians, and HCI researchers, we conducted a series of design workshops to explore more effective approaches to AI concept ideation and problem formulation. We detail our process, the challenges we encountered, and practices and artifacts that proved effective. We discuss the research implications for improved collaboration and stakeholder engagement, and discuss the role HCI might play in reducing the high failure rate experienced in AI innovation.

Indexed as

Brainstorminghealthcarehuman-centered AIideation

Identifiers

PMID40657135
PMCPMC12247186

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.