ArticleIEEE open journal of engineering in medicine and biology2025
Printed Strain Sensors for Motion Recognition: A Review of Materials, Fabrication Methods, and Machine Learning Algorithms.
Article in IEEE open journal of engineering in medicine and biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Low-Temperature Sintering Inks for Printed Bioelectronics: Materials, Mechanisms, and Emerging Ideas.Biosensors · 2026Review
- Advances in Photonic Materials and Integrated Devices for Smart and Digital Healthcare: Bridging the Gap Between Materials and Systems.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2025Review
- Soft Nanomembrane Sensor-Enabled Wearable Multimodal Sensing and Feedback System for Upper-Limb Sensory Impairment Assistance.ACS nano · 2025Article
- Vibration Sensors on Flexible Substrates Based on Nanoparticle Films Grown by Physical Vapor Deposition.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recent studies in functional nanomaterials with advanced macro, micro, and nano-scale structures have yielded substantial improvements in human-interfaced strain sensors for motion and gesture recognition. Furthermore, fundamental advances in nanomaterial printing have been developed and leveraged to translate these materials and mechanical innovations into practical applications. Significant progress in machine learning for human-interfaced strain sensing has unlocked numerous opportunities to improve lives and the human experience through healthcare innovations, sports performance monitoring, and human-machine interfaces. However, several key challenges still must be overcome if strain sensors can become ubiquitous tools for human motion recognition. This review begins with a summary of the critical strain-sensing mechanisms employed today and how recent works have sought to push their boundaries. It then proceeds to cover the primary functional materials used in wearable strain sensors from a performance and printability perspective. Next is a review of recent advances in nanomaterial printing to produce the complex structures necessary for functional devices. Next, we summarize machine learning approaches for human gesture recognition and the myriad applications and use cases for human-interfaced strain sensors. Finally, it concludes with a discussion of challenges and opportunities for future research in the field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.