ReviewDrug design, development and therapy2025
cGAS-STING Targeting Offers Novel Therapeutic Opportunities in Liver Diseases.
Review in Drug design, development and therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mitochondrial quality control in acute liver injury and its therapeutic implications (Review).Molecular medicine reports · 2026Review
- The cGAS-STING pathway: mechanistic basis, dual biological functions and translational therapeutic advances.Apoptosis : an international journal on programmed cell death · 2026Review
- Polyethylene terephthalate microplastics impair erectile function through macrophage mediated cGAS-STING ferroptosis.iScience · 2026Article
- Hepatic mitochondrial signaling as a systemic hub: inter-organ communication networks in aging and aging-related diseases.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Review
- cGAS-STING and PANoptosis: Interplay, Underlying Mechanisms, and Therapeutic Targets.Drug design, development and therapy · 2026Review
- Obesity-Driven Metabolic Disorders: The Interplay of Inflammation and Mitochondrial Dysfunction.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cyclic GMP/AMP (cGAMP) synthase (cGAS), coupled with the endoplasmic reticulum (ER)-anchored adaptor protein stimulator of interferon genes (STING), constitute key components of the type 1 interferon signaling network. cGAS detects both pathogen-derived DNA and aberrant cytosolic self-DNA, establishing the cGAS-STING pathway as a central player in autoimmune disorders, sterile inflammation, and senescence-related processes. However, sustained abnormal activation of this signaling axis is implicated in the pathogenesis of chronic inflammatory and autoimmune conditions. Recent studies have uncovered the pivotal role of cGAS-STING signaling in driving inflammation-associated pathologies, particularly hepatic disorders. Advances in understanding the molecular dynamics of this pathway have facilitated the development of targeted small-molecule inhibitors with therapeutic potential for cGAS-STING-driven liver diseases. In this review, we first delineate the core architecture of the cGAS-STING signaling cascade. Building on this framework, we analyze emerging evidence elucidating the mechanistic contributions of cGAS-STING activation to hepatic pathophysiology. Subsequently, we catalog pharmacologically active compounds capable of modulating this pathway in liver disease models. Finally, we critically evaluate current challenges in translating cGAS-STING-targeted therapies and propose strategic approaches to address these limitations. This synthesis underscores innovative therapeutic opportunities arising from precision modulation of the cGAS-STING axis in liver diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.