ArticleInfectious diseases & clinical microbiology2025
Development of a Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry Method for Quantifying Teicoplanin and Its Application in Critically Ill Patients.
Article in Infectious diseases & clinical microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Teicoplanin, a glycopeptide antibiotic, is used to treat infections caused by Gram-positive pathogens. Trough-level monitoring of teicoplanin is recommended in specific -patient populations, including critically ill patients. This study aimed to develop and validate a liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method to quantify teicoplanin in human plasma and adapt the method to a critically ill patient sample. Materials and Methods: Teicoplanin trough levels were measured using a newly validated LC-MS/MS method. Analysis was conducted using a C18 column with an inner diameter of 2.7 μm (50.0 x 3.0 mm), and vancomycin hydrochloride was used as the internal standard. The method's run time per sample was 5.5 minutes. Non-parametric tests were used for statistical analysis. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression were performed to identify teicoplanin target attainment factors. A Results: The method demonstrated linearity between 1.56-100 mg/L teicoplanin concentration and had a lower limit of detection and quantification of 0.33 mg/L and 1.00 mg/L, respectively. Precision, accuracy, recovery rate, and carry-over effects were all within acceptable limits, according to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) guidance. Twenty patients were included in the study. The target teicoplanin trough level (≥10 mg/L) attainment rate was 50%. The patient's laboratory values did not significantly change after teicoplanin treatment ( Conclusion: The LC-MS/MS assay validated in this study is high-throughput, robust, and quick enough to be implemented in clinical therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) laboratories. More large-scale studies are needed to understand better the relationship between teicoplanin trough levels and patient-related factors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.