ArticleBiology of sport2025
Contextualized high-speed running and sprinting during English Premier League match-play with reference to possession, positional demands and opponent ranking.
Article in Biology of sport, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Using Match Reference Values of External Load to Monitor Performance and Fatigue in Football: Are We Looking the Right Way?Sports medicine - open · 2026Article
- Position-Specific Match Demands in Professional Soccer Assessed Using GPS Technology: A Repeated-Measures Analysis.Sports (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Analysis of professional football players' sprint performance efficiency in matches.Journal of exercise rehabilitation · 2026Article
- Impact of Sprint Performance Characteristics Across Acceleration-Initial Speed Profiles in LALIGA.Sports (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Interaction effects between possession status and percentage: insights from modeling match-running performance across possession status in male soccer.Biology of sport · 2026Article
- Influence of contextualized physical performance metrics on offensive and defensive outcomes in professional football players.Biology of sport · 2026Article
- The effect of contextualised match variables on the metabolic power of elite soccer players during English Premier League match-play.Biology of sport · 2026Article
- Possession in motion: a five-season analysis of running in-possession and out-of-possession with match outcomes in the English Premier League.Biology of sport · 2026Article
- Influence of competitive level and playing position on the physical and technical demands of professional men's football.Biology of sport · 2026Article
- Contextualized acceleration and deceleration profiles of elite soccer players during English Premier League match-play. The effect of possession, positional demands and opponent ranking.Biology of sport · 2025Article
- Does running performance relate to the market value of elite male soccer players? A case study from the FIFA world cup.BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation · 2025Article
- Article
- Comparison of external load during differing microcycle structures across two competitive seasons in elite female Portuguese soccer players.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to compare high-speed running (HSR) and sprint distances (SD) when in- (IP) and out-of-possession (OP) during official English Premier League (EPL) match-play over three consecutive seasons considering playing position, match location and opponent ranking. Match data from 31 male professional soccer players was obtained via an optical tracking system. Results showed that during the IP phase, playing position emerged as the only significant predictor for both HSRIP and SDIP. Wingers showed the highest HSRIP compared to centre-backs who exhibited the lowest values (p < 0.001, ES = 4.19). Similar data were found for SDIP (p < 0.001, ES = 3.30). HSROP was significantly affected by both ranking difference (β = -0.039, p = 0.001) and match location (β = 0.369, p = 0.001). HSROP decreases as the ranking difference increases and tends to be higher during away matches (p = 0.001, ES = 0.24). SDOP was affected by both ranking difference (β = -0.023, p = 0.001) and match location (β = 0.166, p = 0.001) and decreased as the ranking difference increased. SDOP was also higher during away matches (p = 0.001, ES = 0.23). Additionally, a significant interaction was found between playing position and ranking difference (β = 0.005, p = 0.010). Lower ranking differences correspond to higher SDOP values. In conclusion, these findings highlight that by applying these IP and OP insights into practical coaching strategies, teams can potentially enhance individual physical performance and adaptability across different match situations and seasons.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.