ArticleBiology of sport2025
Genetic prediction of lower limb isometric strength changes after 12 weeks of resistance training.
Article in Biology of sport, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to identify genetic variations associated with changes in isometric strength following resistance training and develop a predictive model for understanding training effects, providing insights for tailored fitness guidance. A 12-week resistance training program, consisting of traditional squats and bench press exercises, was completed by 193 healthy Chinese adults, with isometric strength assessed before and after the intervention. DNA was extracted for whole-genome genotyping, followed by genomewide association analysis using PLINK 1.9. Lasso regression was used to screen variables, and predictive models for training effectiveness were established using logistic regression, Nomogram, and stepwise linear regression. Following the training, participants showed an increased isometric strength (Δ = 8.69%, p = 0.08, ES = 0.07), ranging from -55.78% to 133.47%. Nineteen lead SNPs were significantly associated with improvements in lower limb isometric strength (p < 1 × 10
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.