ArticlePeerJ2025
The reading difficulties in Chinese for individuals with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: the role of executive function deficits.
Article in PeerJ, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Cognitive Profiles of Children with Reading Disabilities and/or ADHD.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and reading disability (RD) are prevalent childhood conditions that together affect millions of children worldwide. In China, the prevalence of ADHD is approximately 6.4%, whereas the prevalence of RD ranges from 3.45% to 8%. Approximately 18-45% of children with ADHD also display comorbid RD, which further compromises their academic success and social functioning. Executive-function (EF) deficits are a core feature of ADHD and are known to affect reading in RD, yet their specific impact on Chinese reading remains under-explored. Objective: This study investigated how EF deficits influence Chinese reading in children with ADHD, with the goal of informing diagnosis and intervention for ADHD-RD comorbidity. Methods: This study recruited 160 Chinese-speaking children who met DSM-5 criteria for ADHD and allocated them to two groups-ADHD-only ( Results: Both groups showed no significant differences in ADHD symptom scores. Compared with the ADHD-only group, the ADHD + RD group obtained higher total and subscale DCCC scores and lower accuracies on EF tasks. Total DCCC scores correlated negatively with EF performance, especially on visuospatial working-memory and response-inhibition tasks. Conclusion: This study suggests that individuals with ADHD comorbid with Chinese reading disabilities (RD) exhibit more pronounced deficits in executive function, particularly in verbal and visual-spatial working memory, and response inhibition tasks, compared to individuals with ADHD alone. These cognitive deficits are significantly negatively correlated with Chinese reading abilities, emphasizing the importance of not only focusing on traditional ADHD symptoms but also prioritizing training to enhance executive functions, especially visual-spatial working memory and response inhibition, when diagnosing and treating patients with ADHD comorbid with RD, in order to improve their reading abilities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.