Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40656948›Full record

Trial reportPeerJ2025

Reliability and validity of the six-minute step test in assessing the functional capacity of hemodialysis patients.

Carla Cristina Lima, Maria Eduarda Godoy, Débora Kellen Ferreira Fratoni, Elaine Paulin

Abstract readValidation StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PeerJ, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Reproducibility of the 6-Minute Step Test in Individuals on Hemodialysis.Physiotherapy research international : the journal for researchers and clinicians in physical therapy · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Carla Cristina LimaUniversidade do Estado de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, Brazil.
Maria Eduarda GodoyUniversidade do Estado de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, Brazil.
Débora Kellen Ferreira FratoniUniversidade do Estado de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-5309-8986
Elaine PaulinUniversidade do Estado de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Hemodialysis patients often experience functional limitations that are challenging to assess due to equipment and space constraints. The 6-min step test (6MST) requires little space and a small standardized ergometer, making it more accessible and feasible in various healthcare settings, when compared to the cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) and the 6-min walk test (6MWT). Thus, the aim of this study is to evaluate the test-retest reliability and concurrent validity of the 6MST for assessing the functional capacity of hemodialysis patients. Methods: Assessments conducted included anthropometry, spirometry, 6MWT, and 6MST. These two tests were randomized and performed on alternate days. Two 6MSTs and two 6MWTs were conducted with a minimum interval of 30 min between them. Results: The study involved 32 participants, 67% men ( Conclusion: The 6MST provides a feasible, reliable assessment option for hemodialysis patients and could be easily implemented in clinics lacking space and specialized equipment. Limitation of the present study are being a single-center investigation with a small sample size, thus limiting generalizability, and the variability of patient conditions, which may have influenced the results. Future research should explore the 6' long-term stability, responsiveness, and impact on patient-centered outcomes, as well as its applicability across different hemodialysis populations and clinical settings, to improve its clinical usefulness.

Indexed as

Exercise TestRenal DialysisWalk TestAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsFunctional capacityHemodialysisKidney diseaseReliabilityValidity

Identifiers

PMID40656948
PMCPMC12248222

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.