Trial reportPeerJ2025
Reliability and validity of the six-minute step test in assessing the functional capacity of hemodialysis patients.
Trial report in PeerJ, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Reproducibility of the 6-Minute Step Test in Individuals on Hemodialysis.Physiotherapy research international : the journal for researchers and clinicians in physical therapy · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Hemodialysis patients often experience functional limitations that are challenging to assess due to equipment and space constraints. The 6-min step test (6MST) requires little space and a small standardized ergometer, making it more accessible and feasible in various healthcare settings, when compared to the cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) and the 6-min walk test (6MWT). Thus, the aim of this study is to evaluate the test-retest reliability and concurrent validity of the 6MST for assessing the functional capacity of hemodialysis patients. Methods: Assessments conducted included anthropometry, spirometry, 6MWT, and 6MST. These two tests were randomized and performed on alternate days. Two 6MSTs and two 6MWTs were conducted with a minimum interval of 30 min between them. Results: The study involved 32 participants, 67% men ( Conclusion: The 6MST provides a feasible, reliable assessment option for hemodialysis patients and could be easily implemented in clinics lacking space and specialized equipment. Limitation of the present study are being a single-center investigation with a small sample size, thus limiting generalizability, and the variability of patient conditions, which may have influenced the results. Future research should explore the 6' long-term stability, responsiveness, and impact on patient-centered outcomes, as well as its applicability across different hemodialysis populations and clinical settings, to improve its clinical usefulness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.