SynthesisPeerJ2025
Effectiveness of Schroth exercises for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a meta-analysis.
Synthesis in PeerJ, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Application of Schroth exercise therapy in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a bibliometric analysis.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2026Pooled it
- Agreement of MyotonPRO Measurements Across Standing and Prone Positions in Adolescents with Idiopathic Scoliosis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Effects of proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation and core stabilization on physical and functional parameters in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis: a randomized controlled trial.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026Article
- Radiographic outcomes of stick-assisted manipulation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a retrospective study of 57 patients.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
- Integrative conservative rehabilitation for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a randomized controlled trial of traditional Chinese manual therapy combined with Schroth training.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) affects 2-3% of children aged 10 to 18 and can lead to both physical and psychological challenges. This review aims to evaluate the impact of Schroth exercises on Cobb angle, angle of trunk rotation, and quality of life in patients with AIS. Methods: A comprehensive search was conducted across Scopus, PubMed, CINAHL, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure, Cochrane Central, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases, identifying 11 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with a total of 446 participants. These studies, primarily conducted in Asia and North America, compared the effects of Schroth exercises with either no treatment or alternative physical exercise interventions (standard physiotherapy regimens or non-specific exercise-based rehabilitation programs). Data were pooled using a random-effects model, and the quality of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) approach. Results: Meta-analysis showed that Schroth exercises were associated with a significant reduction in Cobb angle (standardized mean difference (SMD): -0.54; 95% confidence interval (CI) [-0.81 to -0.27]; Conclusions: Although Schroth exercises were associated with a reduction in Cobb angle, the average change did not meet the conventional five-degree threshold considered clinically significant, and the analysis did not account for the natural progression of spinal curvature. Rather than asserting a definitive benefit, this review highlights significant methodological limitations in the current literature.PROSPERO registration number: CRD42024505289.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.