Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40656928›Full record

ArticleJNMA; journal of the Nepal Medical Association2025

Diagnostic Dilemma in Intra-abdominal Cancers.

Gehanath Baral

Abstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in JNMA; journal of the Nepal Medical Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Gehanath BaralDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Nobel Medical College, Biratnagar, Nepal.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Problem statement: A diagnostic dilemma exists in cancer care, especially in intraabdominal lesions. Despite the diagnostic means available so far, clinical decision-making is practically difficult due to diagnostic limitations. The inherent variation of any means influences decision-making. There is an iceberg-like diagnostic inaccuracy in revealing the specific condition or disease. This clinical decision-making gap is worrisome. Conclusion: Besides technological and bio-molecular advancements, the structured working framework would be protective and persuasive in mitigating dilemmas to some extent.

Indexed as

Abdominal NeoplasmsClinical Decision-MakingDiagnosis, DifferentialHumansabdominal cancerscancer imagingdiagnostic dilemmahistopathologytumor markers

Identifiers

PMID40656928
PMCPMC12122273

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.