Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40656913›Full record

ArticleCase reports in women's health2025

Navigating vaginal delivery in a patient with severe uterine prolapse: A case report.

Sarah Sebastian, Nicole Jenkins, Stephanie Pistilli

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Case reports in women's health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The use of pessary for pelvic organ prolapse in pregnancy: A case report.European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology: X · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sarah SebastianDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Jersey Shore University Medical Center, Neptune City, NJ, United States.
Nicole JenkinsDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Jersey Shore University Medical Center, Neptune City, NJ, United States.
Stephanie PistilliDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Jersey Shore University Medical Center, Neptune City, NJ, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) during pregnancy is rare, with few cases to guide clinical management. Vaginal delivery is possible; however, it is associated with increased risk of antepartum and intrapartum complications. This report discusses a case of intrapartum severe uterine prolapse in pregnancy and management techniques which resulted in a successful vaginal delivery. A 43-year-old grand multiparous woman (para 9) presented at 40 weeks in labor with stage III uterine prolapse. She had been diagnosed during her antepartum course, but declined a pessary and opted instead for expectant management. Her labor course was complicated by obstructed labor until she underwent manual reduction of her prolapse, subsequent bedrest, and oxytocin augmentation, leading to vaginal delivery of a term neonate. Her third stage was complicated by uterine atony, managed with bimanual massage and uterotonics. This case illustrates that vaginal delivery is feasible in pregnancies complicated by severe uterine prolapse when pelvic anatomy is appropriately restored. Restoration may facilitate labor progression and reduce the risk of obstructed labor. However, the risk of intrapartum complications remains high. Awareness of these potential complications is critical as impaired uterine contractility from uterine prolapse may limit effective labor mechanics in all stages of labor.

Indexed as

Apical prolapseObstructed laborPelvic organ prolapse in pregnancyUterine atonyUterine prolapse

Identifiers

PMID40656913
PMCPMC12246686

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.