Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40656867›Full record

ArticleMicrofluidics and nanofluidics2025

Using dimensionless numbers to understand interfacial mass transfer for parallel flow in a microchannel.

Anand Sudha, Martin Rohde

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microfluidics and nanofluidics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Anand SudhaRadiation Science and Technology, Technische Universiteit Delft, Mekelweg 5, 2628 CD Delft, The Netherlands.
Martin RohdeRadiation Science and Technology, Technische Universiteit Delft, Mekelweg 5, 2628 CD Delft, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Liquid-liquid Extraction has emerged as a major technique for radioisotope extraction in recent years. This technique is particularly advantageous in the microscale as the surface-volume ratio is much larger. Since some of these radioisotopes have short half-lives, parallel flow in the microscale is used to extract them as it eliminates the need for separating the two fluids. Though such a configuration has been experimentally studied, dimensionless numbers have not been employed to understand the mass transfer mechanisms. This study uses three dimensionless numbers-the Biot, Peclet and Damkohler numbers-to delve deeper into mass transfer with a chemical reaction at the interface. Mass transfer simulations are performed using a Finite Difference model to solve the 2D Convection-Diffusion Equation with a first-order reaction at the interface, and these numbers are varied. The Damkohler number was observed to have the maximal impact on the extraction efficiency, and this was confirmed to be the case when the extraction efficiency didn't change much as long as the Damkohler number was kept constant. In general, a higher Damkohler number results in a higher extraction efficiency and a correlation was proposed to quantify this influence.

Indexed as

KineticsMass transferParallel flowTransport phenomena

Identifiers

PMID40656867
PMCPMC12241239

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.