ArticleDigital health
Optimizing patient education for radioactive iodine therapy and the role of ChatGPT incorporating chain-of-thought technique: ChatGPT questionnaire.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- ChatGPT Versus DeepSeek in Resectability Categorization of Chronic Rhinosinusitis: A Comparison Based on EPOS 2020.World journal of otorhinolaryngology - head and neck surgery · 2026Article
- Quality and reliability of YouTube videos on PET/CT radiation safety: a comparative analysis between human experts and large language models.Japanese journal of radiology · 2026Article
- Assessing multiple chatGPT versions on novel content in the Taiwan urology board examination: accuracy, speed, and domain-specific performance.World journal of urology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: ChatGPT has the potential to enhance patient education by offering clear and accurate responses, but its reliability in providing precise medical information is still under investigation. This study evaluates the effectiveness in assisting healthcare professionals with patient inquiries about radioiodine therapy. Methods: This study used OpenAI's GPT-4o and GPT-4 models, with each query submitted as a separate prompt. Chain-of-thought prompting was utilized to require the model to articulate its step-by-step reasoning prior to the final answer, thereby making the decision process transparent for qualitative evaluation. Three responses were generated per prompt and evaluated by three nuclear medicine doctors using a 4-point Likert scale across five aspects: Appropriateness, Helpfulness, Consistency, Validity of References, and Empathy. Normality test, Wilcoxon signed-rank test, and chi-square tests were used for analysis. Results: A total of 126 paired responses from GPT-4 and GPT-4o were independently rated by three nuclear-medicine physicians. Both models performed similarly across the main dimensions-appropriateness, helpfulness, consistency, and validity of reference-with no statistically significant differences (Wilcoxon signed-rank, Conclusion: The results suggest that ChatGPT can furnish generally appropriate and helpful answers to frequently asked questions in radioactive iodine treatment, yet citation accuracy remains limited, underscoring the need for clinician oversight. GPT-4o and GPT-4 demonstrated comparable performance, indicating that model selection within this family has minimal impact under the controlled conditions studied.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.