ArticleDigital health
Development and validation of machine learning models for osteoporosis prediction in chronic kidney disease patients: Data from National Health and Nutrition Examination survey.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Enhanced early chronic kidney disease prediction using hybrid waterwheel plant algorithm for deep neural network optimization.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To develop and validate machine learning models to predict osteoporosis risk in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients. Methods: Data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (2005-2010, 2013-2014, 2017-2018) included 50,463 participants. Separate models for male and female CKD patients were developed using 59 potential predictors, with key variables selected through the Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator and Boruta algorithms. Seven single-base models, including logistic regression, support vector machine, extreme gradient boosting, K-nearest neighbors, gradient boosting decision tree, random forest (RF), and neural network, were trained. Additionally, stacking ensemble models were constructed. Model performance was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic curves, F1 scores, Matthews correlation coefficient, and Brier scores. The best models were externally validated and visualized for interpretability. Results: Among 3796 CKD patients, osteoporosis prevalence was 12.54% (7.28% in males and 17.57% in females). RF models demonstrated superior performance in each gender. The male RF model achieved an area under the curve of 0.845 in testing set and 0.728 in the external validation set, while the female RF model achieved and 0.859 and 0.812, respectively. Shapley additive explanations values summary plots showed that the top five important features for the male RF model were weight, age, height, Non-Hispanic Black ethnicity, and estimated glomerular filtration rate. For the female RF model, the top five important features were weight, use of female hormone medications, age, Non-Hispanic Black ethnicity, and red blood cell. Online calculators were constructed to facilitate the clinical practical application. Conclusions: The RF model in female CKD patients demonstrated strong predictive performance for osteoporosis, while models for males were less effective.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.