Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40656846›Full record

ReviewDigital health

Association between digital technology use and social capital among older adults: A systematic review.

Giulia Grotto, Alessandra Buja

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Giulia GrottoDepartment of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0562-2717
Alessandra BujaDepartment of Cardiological, Thoracic and Vascular Sciences, and Public Health, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2216-3807

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Social capital refers to the valuable resources that individuals can access through their social networks, which are often established within family ties, professional affiliations, community organizations, and neighborhoods. Evidence suggests that there is a positive association between social capital and well-being, health status, and sociability. Research has found a positive association between digital technology use and social capital, though limited attention has been paid to older adults. This systematic review aims to evaluate the association between digital technology use and social capital among older adults. Methods: Five scientific electronic databases were searched for eligible studies in October 2024. The search strategies were developed by combining the keywords of the three main axes of the research ("older adults," "digital technology," and "social capital") and respective synonyms using Boolean operators. The review protocol was developed in advance and registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024614622). Results: The research strategy returned a total of 1229 citations from electronic databases, 20 of which met the exclusion and inclusion criteria. All the included studies had a cross-sectional design, and the samples of the included studies ranged from 118 to 9642 individuals. All the included studies found a positive association between digital technology and social capital among older adults. Conclusions: Digital technology can offer opportunities to maintain or increase social capital, that typically tends to reduce with age. Since social capital positively impacts health and well-being, the importance of enabling older adults to use digital technologies must be considered when designing and implementing health behavior intervention programs.

Indexed as

digital technologyolder adultssocial capital

Identifiers

PMID40656846
PMCPMC12254645

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.