Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40656844›Full record

ReviewDigital health

Artificial intelligence and machine learning techniques for predicting neuropathic pain in patients with cancer: A systematic review.

Haneen A Taha, Ruqayya S Zeilani, Rabia H Haddad, Maysoon S Abdalrahim

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. An explainable predictive machine learning model of oxaliplatin induced peripheral neuropathy based on clinical data: a retrospective single center.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Haneen A TahaSchool of Nursing, Clinical Nursing Department, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan.
Ruqayya S ZeilaniSchool of Nursing, Clinical Nursing Department, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan.
Rabia H HaddadFaculty of Nursing, Nursing Department, Philadelphia University. Amman, Jordan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5963-824X
Maysoon S AbdalrahimSchool of Nursing, Clinical Nursing Department, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Neuropathic pain (NP) remains a complex, under-recognized complication among cancer patients, frequently arising from surgery, chemotherapy, or radiotherapy. Early prediction is crucial for timely intervention, yet conventional tools often fall short due to their reactive and subjective nature. Aim: This systematic review aims to evaluate the application of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) techniques in predicting NP and related outcomes among oncology patients, highlighting model performance, predictors, and limitations. Methods: Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines, a comprehensive search was conducted across PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, IEEE Xplore, and Google Scholar for English-language studies published between January 2020 and February 2025. Fourteen eligible studies were included based on predefined Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcome, Study Design (PICOS) criteria. The risk of bias was assessed using QUADAS-2 and PROBAST tools. Results: Most studies in high-income countries focused on breast cancer. Supervised models such as random forest (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) up to 0.94), support vector machine (AUC 0.808-0.87), and deep learning architectures were dominant. Key predictive features included acute postoperative pain, anxiety, type of surgery, and biomarkers like sphinganine-1-phosphate. Only 14% of studies used external validation, and 5% assessed calibration. Multimodal frameworks integrating clinical, emotional, imaging, and molecular data outperformed single-modality models. Conclusion: AI and ML hold significant promise for enhancing NP prediction in cancer care. However, methodological limitations-particularly poor calibration, low external validation, and limited interpretability-currently hinder clinical adoption. Standardization, explainable AI, and diverse datasets are essential for future progress.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencemachine learningNeuropathic painoncology

Identifiers

PMID40656844
PMCPMC12246673

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.