Observational studyJNMA; journal of the Nepal Medical Association2025
Ultrasound-guided Hydrostatic Reduction of Acute Intussusception in Children at a Tertiary Care Center: An Observational Study.
Observational study in JNMA; journal of the Nepal Medical Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Ultrasound-guided hydrostatic enema reduction for intussusception in children younger than 12 months: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Pediatric surgery international · 2026Pooled it
- A vision transformer deep learning model for assessing pediatric ileocolic intussusception severity using ultrasound images.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Clinical Determinants of Unsuccessful Ultrasound-Guided Hydrostatic Saline Reduction in Children with Intussusception Post-Rotavirus Vaccine Introduction: Insights from a Tertiary Care Centre in Thrissur, Kerala, India.Indian journal of pediatrics · 2025Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Intussusception is common cause of acute emergency responsible for bowel obstruction in infants and toddlers with peak age of incidence between 6-9 months. Ultrasound is imaging modality of choice for diagnosis of intussusception and ultrasound guided hydrostatic enema reduction is standard, nonsurgical, internationally preferred treatment modality for uncomplicated pediatric intussusceptions. This study was aimed to find the outcome of the procedure. Methods: An observational cross-section was carried in a tertiary care center in children presenting with intussusception. Ultrasoud guided hydrostatic reduction was done in all radiologically confirmed intussusception in children presenting to our tertiary hospital from February 2023 to July 2024 fulfilling the inclusion criteria after proper resuscitation. Patients having marked abdominal distension with features of peritonitis were excluded from the study. Ethical approval was obtained from Institutional Review Committee (Reference number: 287/2023). Results: Total 81 patients with 84 intussusceptions underwent ultrasound guided hydrostatic reduction with male to female ratio of 2.86 and mean age 9.49±8.43 months. Hydrostatic reduction was successful in 78 (92.85%) cases. Among successful reductions, 3 (3.84%) patients had recurrence and repeat successful hydrostatic reduction was done. Presenting complain seen were abdominal pain 81 (100%) , vomiting 72 (88.89%). Ileocolic intussusception was seen in 74 (88.09%). Conclusions: The success rate of ultrasound-guided hydrostatic reduction using normal saline for uncomplicated intussusception was consistent with findings from previous studies conducted in similar settings, which utilized both hydrostatic and pneumatic reduction methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.