Observational studyJNMA; journal of the Nepal Medical Association2025
Clinico-demographical Profile of Pelvis and Acetabular Fracture Presenting in Tertiary Care Center of Nepal: An Observational Study.
Observational study in JNMA; journal of the Nepal Medical Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Pelvis and acetabular fractures are complex, high-energy trauma and are often associated with life threatening injuries. The majority of them require surgical intervention and extensive rehabilitation. The epidemic figures are necessary to make plan for their management and its complications. We aim to analyze epidemiological profile of patients presented with pelvis and acetabular fracture in our center. Methods: This was observational cross-section study, analyzed on patients admitted with pelvis and acetabular fracture at a tertiary care center through emergency and outpatient department between January to December 2023. The collected parameters were age, gender, mechanism of injury, site of injury, classification of fracture, associated other injuries, management operative or non-operative, early post-operative complications, duration of hospital stay, mortality and Intensive Care Unit admission and they were analyzed. Ethical approval was obtained from Institutinal Review Committee (Reference number: 19/2024). Results: There were 48 (7.27%) pelvis and/or acetabular fracture amongst 660 patient with traumatic fractures. Pelvic fracture was 29 (4.39%) and acetabular fracture was 16 (2.42%). The median age was 38 years (IQR: 25.25-46.75) and 36 (75%) were male. Thirty three (69%) patients required surgery, 17 (35%) patients had additional surgery for associated injury and 14 (29%) required intensive care unit admission. The median hospital stay was 12.5 days and mortality rate were 2%. Conclusions: The proportion of pelvis fracture was comparable to other studies while the proportion of actebular was comparatively higher in this study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.