ArticleCardiovascular diagnosis and therapy2025
Novel risk prediction model for major adverse cardiovascular events in minimally invasive mitral valve surgery: a retrospective study.
Article in Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Application of artificial intelligence in predicting the results of open-heart surgery: a scoping review.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery (MIMVS) has become the standard procedure for treating mitral valve pathologies. However, the existing cardiac risk model fails to consider the distinctive perfusion and ventilation techniques of MIMVS, leading to inaccurate prediction of perioperative risks. This study aimed to identify the perioperative risk factors for major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) in MIMVS and develop a predictive model based on these factors. Methods: This single-center retrospective study recruited 480 patients undergoing MIMVS at Beijing Anzhen Hospital between April 2010 and May 2024 and collected data on 79 perioperative clinical variables. The primary outcome was MACE within 30 days postoperatively. Univariate Cox regression analysis was used to analyze the associations between variables and outcomes, whereas elastic net regression was used to develop a risk prediction model (CompliMit Score) for MACE. The model was validated using 200 bootstrap replicates. Results: The 30-day MACE rate was 12%, and 31 clinical variables significantly correlated with MACE: 13 preoperatively, 9 intraoperatively, and 9 postoperatively. From these, we developed the CompliMit Score, which included 14 risk factors identified through elastic net regression. The CompliMit Score identified more high-risk patients for MACE than the European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation II {area under the curve: 0.92 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.88-0.96] Conclusions: Factors influencing MIMVS prognosis included preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative variables. The newly developed CompliMit Score effectively identified patients who are at high risk of perioperative MACE, thus facilitating targeted postoperative care and resource allocation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.