ReviewCardiovascular diagnosis and therapy2025
Distal radial access in interventional cardiology: technique, pitfalls and recommendations.
Review in Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Learning curve of distal transradial access for coronary intervention: a single-center retrospective study.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- Right or Left: Which Is the Right Radial Access for Liver Transarterial Chemoembolization?Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Feasibility of the distal transradial approach with an 8-Fr balloon guide catheter for neurointerventional procedures.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Distal radial access (DRA) is a relatively novel approach in interventional cardiology and represents an evolution of transradial techniques. This approach involves accessing the distal radial artery (DRart) in the anatomical snuffbox, offering an alternative to traditional radial and femoral access, with demonstrated benefits over conventional transradial access (TRA), such as a lower rate of radial artery occlusion, shorter hemostasis time, and improved patient comfort. DRA is technically more demanding compared to TRA. The smaller size of the DRart and the anatomical landmarks that surround it make it more difficult to cannulate, especially for operators who are less experienced with the approach. This increased difficulty can result in higher initial failure rates and longer procedural times, all of which contribute to a steeper learning curve. This review aims to provide a comprehensive guide to the use of DRA for the interventional cardiologist to take full advantage of the approach by summarizing current evidence and experienced operator recommendations, focusing on practical recommendations on techniques to improve procedural success, minimize complications, and optimize results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.