ArticleArthroscopy techniques2025
A Simplified Technique for Arthroscopic Reduction and Double-Pulley Fixation of Bony Bankart Lesion by Percutaneous Spinal Needle Suture.
Article in Arthroscopy techniques, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bony Bankart lesion is commonly seen and highly associated with anterior glenohumeral instability. However, the reported arthroscopic techniques that reduce and fix bony Bankart lesion with traditional suture devices may encounter several problems during the suture-passing process, including splitting the fracture fragment or surrounding soft tissue, resulting in iatrogenic damage, and causing difficulties for instrument operation and suture management. Here, we have proposed a simplified technique for arthroscopic reduction and fixation of bony Bankart lesion by the introduction of percutaneous suturing with a spinal needle, which has a lower risk of iatrogenic damage, lower possibility of splitting the fracture fragment or surrounding soft tissue, and less difficulty in suturing during operation and suture management. Our technique, a combination of percutaneous spinal needle suture passing and s double-pulley suture-tying technique, is less invasive to patients, more convenient and economical, and more suitable for beginners, which is challenging to achieve with a traditional suture device. In addition, the equipment used in our technique is commonly seen and accessible in the operating room, without requiring high-value consumables and supporting instruments. In summary, our technique, integrating economy, simplicity, reliability, and safety, has very good application potential in clinical situations.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.