Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40656652›Full record

ArticleOrthopaedic journal of sports medicine2025

Six-Month Functional Scores Predict 5-Year Achievement of the Minimal Clinically Important Differences After Hip Arthroscopy for Symptomatic Acetabular Labral Tears.

Stephen M Gillinov, Jonathan S Lee, Bilal S Siddiq, Kieran S Dowley, Nathan J Cherian, Christopher T Eberlin, Michael P Kucharik, Scott D Martin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. What the papers say.Journal of hip preservation surgery · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Stephen M GillinovDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5630-4079
Jonathan S LeeDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Bilal S SiddiqDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Kieran S DowleyDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1758-9929
Nathan J CherianDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Nebraska, Omaha, Nebraska, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1524-3908
Christopher T EberlinDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.
Michael P KucharikDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, USA.
Scott D MartinDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Despite the increasing utilization of hip arthroscopy and identification of predictors of poor outcomes, the effect of short-term improvement on long-term functional outcomes has been understudied. Purpose: To determine whether improvements in patient-reported outcomes (PROs) 6 months after hip arthroscopy predict 5-year outcomes. Study Design: Case-control study. Methods: A retrospective review of prospectively collected data identified patients ≥18 years who underwent primary hip arthroscopy by a single surgeon for the treatment of symptomatic labral tears. Included patients had a Tönnis grade <2 and completed PROs at baseline, 6-month, and minimum 2-year follow-up, and annually thereafter. The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for the modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), 8 points, was used to stratify patients into cohorts based on high improvement (HI) versus low improvement (LI) at 6 months. PROs were compared at 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years postoperatively by rates of MCID achievement and linear mixed-effects modeling. Subsequent surgery rates were compared by chi-square or Fisher exact tests, as appropriate. Results: Overall, 175 patients (age, 37.2 ± 11.4 years; 52.0% female) met inclusion criteria. Of these, 131 HI patients were compared with 44 LI patients. At 5 years, 88.3% of HI patients reached MCID, versus 42.1% of LI patients ( Conclusion: The study demonstrates that early functional improvements after hip arthroscopy, assessed by 6-month MCID, predicted clinically meaningful outcomes at 5-year follow-up, underscoring the importance of early cautious recovery to prioritize labral healing while also meeting appropriate, stepwise rehabilitation milestones to advance functionally during these 6 months. Despite this, LI patients continued improving for 5 years, demonstrating that late functional improvements are still possible for certain patients in the event of a poor 6-month rehabilitation period.

Indexed as

acetabular labral tearsfemoroacetabular impingementfunctional outcomeship arthroscopyminimal clinically important difference

Identifiers

PMID40656652
PMCPMC12246522

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.