ArticleInternational journal of integrated care
Case Management for People with Acquired Brain Injury with Complex Problems (Part 2): Process Evaluation of a One-Group Trial.
Article in International journal of integrated care. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Case Management for People with Acquired Brain Injury with Complex Problems (Part 1): Outcomes of a One-group Trial.International journal of integrated careArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: People with acquired brain injury (PwABI) and their families may face psychosocial problems and unmet needs. We assessed the feasibility of Case Management (CM) for PWABI in the Netherlands which aims to facilitate access to and integration of health care and social services for people with complex problems. Methods: We evaluated if CM was delivered according to plan, if participants and case managers (CMrs) were satisfied with CM, and which factors affected implementation. Data were collected using evaluation forms, logs and minutes, and interviews. Results: Twenty-eight PwABI, 13 caregivers, 17 CMr and all 3 project leaders participated. CM key elements were applied. PwABI and their caregivers generally expressed satisfaction with CM, though for some it did not meet expectations. CMrs valued the continuous involvement and the ability to support family. Facilitators were CMr working independent from existing care services and the diversity in expertise in the CMr teams. Barriers were imposed when a region offers medical stroke care but no integrated long-term services after brain injury. Discussion: It is important to ensure clear communication with PwABI and their family regarding the roles of CMr, as well as managing and aligning expectations. Conclusion: CM after ABI is feasible and warrants further research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.