Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40656642›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of integrated care

Intersectoral Collaboration Among Community Health and Social Workers in Disability-Related Organizations in South Korea: Awareness, Perceived Importance, Frequency, and Satisfaction.

Hye-Jin Kim, Jae-Young Lim, Soong-Nang Jang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of integrated care. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hye-Jin KimChung-Ang University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2365-8713
Jae-Young LimDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Gyeonggi-do, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9454-0344
Soong-Nang JangChung-Ang University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2621-945X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Disability research and policy emphasize cross-sector collaboration due to the complexity of disability. This study aimed to assess service providers' awareness of disability-related community resources and evaluate their perceptions of the importance, frequency, and satisfaction with intersectoral collaboration. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in Gyeonggi Province, Korea, using a mixed-methods design. The quantitative component examined community health and social workers' awareness, perceived importance, frequency, and satisfaction with intersectoral collaboration. Qualitative data were collected through an open-ended survey question and analyzed using content analysis. Results: Findings revealed low awareness of medical and public health agencies, particularly newly designated disability-focused organizations in Korea, and infrequent collaboration despite its recognized importance. Differences in perceived importance and collaboration frequency across sectors were visualized using the IPA grid. Six key themes emerged from the qualitative analysis: 'Information,' 'Governance,' 'Administrative processes,' 'Workforce,' 'Resources,' and 'Clients.' Discussion: The differences and commonalities in service providers' perceptions, depending on their sector affiliation, highlight opportunities for policymakers to implement strategies that foster cross-sector partnerships. Conclusions: This study underscores the role of awareness and perceived importance in fostering cross-sector collaboration, offering insights for future policies and initiatives aimed at improving collaboration in disability care.

Indexed as

Care coordinationDisabilitiesImportance-Performance analysisIntegrated careIntersectoral collaboration

Identifiers

PMID40656642
PMCPMC12247789

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.