Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40656641›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of integrated care

Impact of Health and Health-Related Domains on Professionals' Perceptions of Care Complexity, Their Preferences for Integrated Care Planning and Interprofessional Collaboration.

Lisa-Maria van Klaveren, Vincent G M Geukers, Rien de Vos

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of integrated care. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lisa-Maria van KlaverenInstitute for Education and Training, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2281-3806
Vincent G M GeukersDepartment of Pediatric Intensive Care, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam UMC, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6466-949X
Rien de VosInstitute for Education and Training, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0901-3310

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Increasing healthcare complexity necessitates the integration of perspectives from professionals with diverse expertise, patients, and families for optimal care. However, there is no consensus on 'care complexity', and expectations for integrated care planning vary. This study examines how different health domains influence professionals' perceptions and preferences. Methods: Ninety-eight medical doctors and nursing professionals assessed care complexity, integrated care planning needs, and interprofessional collaboration using thirteen paper cases based on five domains from the International Classification for Functioning (ICF). Conjoint analysis explored perceptions, preferences, and variations by occupation and work experience. Results: Higher care complexity and need for integrated care planning were linked to impairments of body functions, complex personal factors in terms of chronic health condition and medical needs, and external factors. Allied health, social, and external professionals were more frequently included in multidisciplinary team meetings based on domain-specific complexities. Medical doctors showed a greater tendency than nursing professionals to involve family in integrated care planning. Discussion: The study identifies key drivers of care complexity and integrated care planning, revealing occupation- and experience-based differences. Addressing these differences is crucial for improving interprofessional collaboration. Conclusion: This research provides a multidimensional view of care complexity, highlighting the factors that shape professionals' preferences for integrated care planning.

Indexed as

care complexityconjoint analysisICFintegrated careinterprofessional collaboration

Identifiers

PMID40656641
PMCPMC12247846

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.