Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40656631›Full record

ReviewBJA open2025

Challenges in achieving more sustainable anaesthesia practices: a narrative review of waste reduction.

Erlend J Skraastad, Ofelia L Elvir-Lazo, Paul F White, David Chernobylsky, Ravina Brring, Roya Yumul

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BJA open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Erlend J SkraastadClinic of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway.
Ofelia L Elvir-LazoDepartment of Anesthesiology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Paul F WhiteDepartment of Anesthesiology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
David ChernobylskyDepartment of Anesthesiology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Ravina BrringDepartment of Anesthesiology, UC Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, CA, USA.
Roya YumulDepartment of Anesthesiology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anaesthesia and operating room waste contribute to climate change and environmental pollution. Although professional bodies involving anaesthesiologists and surgeons have developed guidelines for supporting environmentally conscious health practices, practitioners face difficulties implementing these protocols in hospitals. This narrative review explores the current literature concerning the environmental impact of anaesthesia and operating room waste. We also discuss obstacles practitioners face in implementing initiatives to decrease anaesthetic and surgical waste. A literature review of peer-reviewed publications was conducted across PubMed, MEDLINE, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Databases to identify relevant articles published from 1980 to 2025. A search of recent anaesthesia, surgery, and medicine journals provided additional data. Around 2% of urban solid waste is medical waste, and healthcare accounts for 5% of global greenhouse gas emissions. Scientific organisations have clearly defined guidelines and recommendations to reduce environmental impact. Barriers to implementing existing recommendations include the lack of proper facilities for recycling waste materials, provider workload concerns, lack of hospital leadership, lack of specific targets and accountability measures, insufficient education, and overall resistance to change. Anaesthetic and solid operating room waste pose significant global health concerns, necessitating a collective effort towards sustainability. Anaesthesia and operating room professionals must recognise their responsibility for promoting environmentally friendly practices. Hospital leadership is pivotal to creating a supportive framework. Hospitals and healthcare systems should be required to adhere to specific targets and accountability measures. Meaningful change requires collaboration with a wide range of stakeholders, including politicians, patients, the medical industry, and scientific organisations.

Indexed as

anaesthetic gasanaesthetic wasteclimate changehospital wasteoperating room wasterecyclingsustainability

Identifiers

PMID40656631
PMCPMC12255364

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.