ReviewAvicenna journal of phytomedicine
Effects of royal jelly consumption on inflammation and oxidative stress: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Review in Avicenna journal of phytomedicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This systematic review and meta-analysis examines the impact of royal jelly (RJ) on inflammation and oxidative stress. By synthesizing existing research, it aims to provide valuable insights into the potential health benefits of RJ. Materials and Methods: PubMed/Medline, Web of Science, and Scopus were searched until the end of December 2023. This meta-analysis included all randomized clinical trials assessing the effect of RJ supplements on serum levels of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), total antioxidant capacity (TAC), and malondialdehyde (MDA). A random-effects model was utilized to calculate the pooled mean differences (MD) and 95% confidence interval. Results: Seven suitable datasets from 6 trials were considered eligible. RJ supplementation significantly reduced MDA (WMD, -1.79 (-3.00 to -0.58), p=0.004; I Conclusion: Although this meta-analysis confirmed that RJ could be a useful intervention to reduce oxidative stress, this research should be updated in future due to the restricted number of trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.