Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40656571›Full record

ArticleRSC advances2025

Multiscale characterization of commercial and landfill-recovered plastics in Songkhla province, Thailand.

Nisamon Thongham, Parinya Khongprom, Chontira Sangsubun

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in RSC advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nisamon ThonghamFaculty of Science and Digital Innovation, Thaksin University Phatthalung 93210 Thailand schontira@tsu.ac.th.
Parinya KhongpromDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Prince of Songkla University Songkhla 90112 Thailand kparinya@eng.psu.ac.th.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7222-3532
Chontira SangsubunFaculty of Science and Digital Innovation, Thaksin University Phatthalung 93210 Thailand schontira@tsu.ac.th.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study provides a comprehensive assessment of five types of plastics: commercial polyethylene (PE), polypropylene (PP), polyethylene terephthalate (PET), polyvinyl chloride (PVC), and landfill-derived polyethylene [PE (LF)] from Songkhla Province, Thailand. PE (LF) was naturally exposed to environmental conditions. Through advanced multiscale characterization techniques, including scanning electron microscopy (SEM), thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), tensile testing, and Fourier-Transform Infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), it was found that prolonged exposure to landfill conditions causes substantial physical, mechanical, and chemical degradation in PE (LF), as evidenced by extensive surface cracks, reduced tensile strength (below 10 MPa), and the formation of oxidative functional groups (C[double bond, length as m-dash]O and -OH). In contrast, commercial plastics maintain superior stability and mechanical integrity. Despite this degradation, PE (LF) retains significant potential for energy recovery

Identifiers

PMID40656571
PMCPMC12247160

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.