ArticleJournal of reliable intelligent environments2025
Intelligent dynamic cybersecurity risk management framework with explainability and interpretability of AI models for enhancing security and resilience of digital infrastructure.
Article in Journal of reliable intelligent environments, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence driven approach for securing backup data and enhancing cyber resilience in sustainable smart infrastructure.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Entropy Method for Decision Making with Uncertainty.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Privacy-aware adversarial defense with explainable AI for adversarial robustness in AI model.Journal of reliable intelligent environments · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The sophistication of cyberattacks has significantly increased, making it almost certain that organizations can be victims of cyberattacks at any time. Managing cybersecurity risk is critical for any organization so that informed decisions can be made to tackle risks before they materialize. Cybersecurity risk management is context-specific and heavily relies on the specific organization's context. However, performing effective risk management is always challenging due to the constant changes in organizational infrastructure and security posture, including the adoption of new applications and the reconfiguration or updating of existing assets and their dependencies, as well as the potential exploitation of vulnerabilities. Despite the wider adoption of AI enabled cybersecurity risk management, there is a lack of focus on the integration of these systems along with the dynamic elements of the risk management. In this context, this research proposes a novel dynamic cyber security risk management (d-CSRM) framework to tackle this challenge by integrating dynamic parameters such as vulnerability exploitation and assets dependencies for assessing and managing the risk. The framework consists of a systemic process and makes use of a hybrid AI-enabled model that combines both linear regression and deep learning, to prioritize the vulnerabilities. Additionally, d-CSRM integrates the explainability and interpretability characteristics of the AI model for explaining model decision making and the inner working parameters. This allows the extraction of the key features that are linked with the risk and informed decision making to tackle the risks. An experiment was performed to prioritize the vulnerabilities from the widely used CVEjoin dataset using the proposed hybrid model to quantify the dynamic risk with explainability. The results show that the hybrid model effectively identifies and prioritizes the most critical vulnerabilities using the selected key features such as exploit type, exploit platform and impact that can further enhance the dynamic risk assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.