ReviewSurgical neurology international2025
Cerebrospinal fluid analysis in tuberculous meningitis: A literature review.
Review in Surgical neurology international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pathogens of the Human Central Nervous System- the Major Bacterial Pathogens.Molecular neurobiology · 2026Review
- Rifampin monotherapy for multidrug-resistantFrontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Tuberculous meningitis (TBM) is the most common central nervous system infection of Methods: This scientific work aims to determine the penetration rate of first-line anti-TB drugs that are often used in patients infected with Results: The results of CSF analysis depend on the volume of CSF used, the delivery of the sample, and the technical expertise of the clinician. If clinically, a patient is suspected of having TBM even though the results of CSF analysis show negative results for Conclusion: The use of INH is beneficial because it has high bactericidal activity. Gatifloxacin and ciprofloxacin, which are included in the fluoroquinolone class of drugs, are safe to use even though their CSF penetration is not as good as levofloxacin.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.