ArticleBrain & spine2025
Interpersonal and systemic factors in initiating, developing and maintaining collaborations between European neurosurgical departments and institutions in low-resources settings: A qualitative study.
Article in Brain & spine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Neurosurgical care in low- and middle-income countries faces persistent challenges, including insufficient infrastructure, lack of trained surgeons, and limited access to sustainable training programs. Collaborative initiatives with high-income countries aim to address these gaps. However, in-depth studies of European-led partnerships and the interpersonal and systemic factors underpinning their success remain limited. Research question: What are the most salient interpersonal and systemic factors relevant to the a) initiation, b) development, and c) maintenance of effective and sustainable collaborations between European neurosurgical departments and institutions in resource-limited settings? Material and methods: We conducted a prospective qualitative study using semi-structured interviews with fourteen matched neurosurgeons-seven from European centers and seven from LMIC institutions-engaged in such collaborations. Data were collected virtually between May and August 2024. Transcripts were analyzed thematically to identify major themes, which were coded and categorized. Results: Twelve themes emerged, grouped into three stages: a) initiation: trust and personal connections, systematic planning and foundations, local context and needs, institutional and government support; b) development: capacity building and skills development, academic and research growth, challenges to development and adaptation; c) maintenance: sustainability and independence, resources and logistical support, communication and continuous commitment, outcome measures and accountability, and challenges to maintenance and advices for continuity. Discussion and conclusions: Findings highlight recurring interpersonal and systemic dynamics central to successful long-term partnerships. This study provides context-specific, real-world insights into their practical execution. Future efforts should focus on developing targeted recommendations to strengthen global neurosurgical collaborations and address inequities in access to care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.