ArticleCureus2025
Rational Utilization of Sugammadex Through Quantitative Twitch Monitoring: A Process Improvement Project at a Large Academic Medical Center.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Sugammadex rapidly became the standard of care for neuromuscular blockade reversal at our institution, leading to a substantial increase in pharmacy costs. We hypothesized that administering sugammadex in 75 mg aliquots, rather than 200 mg vials, would improve adherence to FDA dosing guidelines, reduce costs, and promote greater use of quantitative neuromuscular monitoring. Methods This retrospective study analyzed a departmental process improvement initiative. Baseline sugammadex use (Phase 1) was assessed between July 2021 and January 2022, during which only qualitative neuromuscular monitoring was employed. From February to August 2022 (Phase 2), pre-filled 75 mg sugammadex syringes were introduced. In Phase 3, from September 2022 to January 2023, these aliquots were used alongside quantitative twitch monitoring. The primary outcome was the average sugammadex dose per case. Patient characteristics and secondary outcomes, including neuromuscular blockade monitoring and documentation, as well as safety event reporting, were also evaluated. Results There were no significant differences in patient demographics or comorbidities across phases. With the introduction of 75 mg sugammadex aliquots, the average dose per case decreased by 55.4 mg (95% CI: 52.1-58.8). Following the implementation of quantitative monitoring, the dose increased by 10.8 mg (95% CI: 7.3-14.3). Documentation of neuromuscular blockade improved, and no changes in reported safety events were observed across phases. Conclusions The use of smaller compounded sugammadex aliquots, combined with quantitative monitoring and appropriate education, can improve neuromuscular blockade reversal practices while reducing healthcare costs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.