Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40656320›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

The Potential, Applications, and Challenges of Internet of Things (IoT) Technologies From the Perspectives of Clinicians.

Abdullah Alanazi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Abdullah AlanaziDepartment of Health Informatics, College of Public Health and Health Informatics, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, SAU.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction The introduction of the Internet of Things (IoT) in our lives ranges from simple tracking to smart homes. While the healthcare sector is still lagging, this study aims to explore the feasibility and challenges of incorporating IoT into the healthcare industry. Method This study employed a qualitative approach to gather clinicians' opinions from various healthcare professions. Data were collected, and consensus was reached through three rounds of discussions. Results Twenty-four participants were involved in this study, out of whom 45% were physicians. The participants agreed on the potential benefits of IoT, which include improved quality, accessibility, and efficiency of healthcare. They identified several potential applications of IoT, including patient monitoring, hospital and medication management, tracking devices, and telemedicine. However, some challenges related to regulations, infrastructure, the need for reforms in reimbursement, and concerns over patient privacy and data confidentiality were also noted. Conclusion Collaborative efforts should be initiated to enhance the adoption of IoT in healthcare. These efforts should not be limited to regulatory, legal, and technical aspects. Additionally, there should be a shift in perspective that extends healthcare services beyond the confines of healthcare organizations.

Indexed as

accessdevicesiotmonitoringthe internet of thing

Identifiers

PMID40656320
PMCPMC12256036

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.