Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40656310›Full record

ReviewCureus2025

Antibiotic Misuse: An In-Depth Examination of Its Global Consequences and Public Health Challenges.

Jeevan Nammi, Roshini Pasala, Nikhil Andhe, Ramakanth Vasam, Ausrit Datta Poruri, Ravishankar Raj Sherikar

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Phenotypic and Genomic Profiling ofAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  10. Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  11. Caerin 1.1/1.9 peptides controlFrontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jeevan NammiMedicine, Siddhartha Medical College, Vijayawada, IND.
Roshini PasalaMedicine, Siddhartha Medical College, Vijayawada, IND.
Nikhil AndheMedicine, Siddhartha Medical College, Vijayawada, IND.
Ramakanth VasamMedicine, Siddhartha Medical College, Vijayawada, IND.
Ausrit Datta PoruriMedicine, Siddhartha Medical College, Vijayawada, IND.
Ravishankar Raj SherikarGeneral Surgery, Gandhi Medical College, Secunderabad, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antibiotic misuse is a growing global threat, driving the rise of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) and endangering our ability to treat common infections and save lives effectively. This paper takes a closer look at how and why antibiotics are being misused in different parts of the world, whether it is through overprescribing by doctors, self-medication by patients, or a lack of strong healthcare regulations. We also explore the serious consequences of AMR, not just for individual patients but for entire health systems and economies. The paper highlights the important roles played by healthcare workers, patients, governments, and the pharmaceutical industry in either contributing to or helping solve this problem. Finally, we discuss practical solutions that have shown promise, such as better education, stricter policies, improved diagnostics, and coordinated action plans. Our goal is to show that reversing antibiotic misuse is not only possible but urgently necessary and that everyone has a role to play in making it happen.

Indexed as

antibiotic controlantimicrobial resistanceantimicrobial stewardship programglobal epidemiologypublic health education

Identifiers

PMID40656310
PMCPMC12256094

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.