ArticleCureus2025
Clinical Profile and Magnetic Resonance Angiographic Findings Among Patients With Cerebrovascular Stroke.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Stroke diagnosis is simplified when magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings correlate with the clinical features. The present study evaluated the clinical profile in cerebrovascular stroke patients. In addition, the MR angiographic profile of cerebrovascular stroke was assessed, and the clinical and MR angiographic findings were compared in ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke. Methodology This was a hospital-based cross-sectional study conducted among 50 stroke patients, including patients clinically diagnosed with stroke, ischemic, and hemorrhagic, presenting within 48-72 h of the onset of symptoms. Results In this study, the prevalence of ischemic stroke and hemorrhagic stroke was 40 (80.0%) and 10 (20.0%), respectively. The incidence of seizures (p = 0.007) and headache (p = 0.000) was higher in hemorrhagic stroke when compared to ischemic stroke. The mean fibrinogen level was higher in ischemic stroke when compared to hemorrhagic stroke (441.5 ± 152.04 vs. 308.5 ± 107.3 mg/dL; p = 0.012). The MR angiographic profile was normal in all 10 cases of hemorrhagic stroke; meanwhile, in ischemic stroke, only five (12.5%) had normal findings (p < 0.001). MR angiography (MRA) findings indicated that among ischemic stroke patients, the majority of cases involved the middle cerebral artery (MCA) with nine cases (22.5%), followed by the posterior cerebral artery (PCA) with four cases (10%), and both the internal carotid artery (ICA) and anterior cerebral artery (ACA) with two cases (5%) each. Conclusion In this study, ischemic stroke was more prevalent than hemorrhagic stroke. MRA proved valuable in differentiating stroke subtypes and identifying involved vessels in ischemic cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.