ArticleCureus2025
Testicular Rupture Associated With an Unconventional Mechanism of Action.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Salvage of a Penetrating Bilateral Testicular Gunshot Injury Using an Autologous Free Tunica Albuginea Graft from the Excised Contralateral Testis: A Case Report.Research and reports in urology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Testicular and scrotal trauma is most commonly divided into two classifications based on the mechanism of action, blunt and penetrating, with penetrating trauma being reported more frequently. Blunt testicular injury is often due to motor vehicle accidents or contact sports where scrotal protection is not regularly worn, such as basketball or soccer. Several hours after initially being struck in the left testicle by a fiberglass pole while vaulting, a 23-year-old man presented to the emergency department for testicular pain and swelling. Scrotal edema and ecchymosis were found on physical examination. Ultrasound findings showed a hydrocele with debris and structural changes within the testicle, suggestive of a testicular rupture. The patient was taken to the operating room for decompression of the hydrocele and further exploration. A testicular rupture was confirmed and repaired with partial resection of the seminiferous tubules. A follow-up appointment two weeks after surgery showed a well-healed incision without complication, and a semen analysis was completed at six weeks with normal results. This case exhibits a unique mechanism of action for testicular rupture due to the lack of track-and-field-related trauma reported within the literature. Rapid diagnostic and surgical treatment were vital in this case to reduce the risk of fertility concerns and orchiectomy. Emergency medical providers must have a high index of suspicion for testicular rupture, given the severe complications if such a diagnosis is missed despite unusual mechanisms of injury.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.