Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40656190›Full record

ArticlePostepy w kardiologii interwencyjnej = Advances in interventional cardiology2025

Laser For complex coronary Artery lesion pReparatiOn: the results of the pilot FARO study.

Vittorio Ambrosini, Pietro Armigliato, Antonio Colombo, Massimo Napodanno, Luca Golino

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Postepy w kardiologii interwencyjnej = Advances in interventional cardiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Vittorio AmbrosiniCLS: Cardiovascular Laser Society Foundation, Verona, Italy.
Pietro ArmigliatoCLS: Cardiovascular Laser Society Foundation, Verona, Italy.
Antonio ColomboCLS: Cardiovascular Laser Society Foundation, Verona, Italy.
Massimo NapodannoCLS: Cardiovascular Laser Society Foundation, Verona, Italy.
Luca GolinoCLS: Cardiovascular Laser Society Foundation, Verona, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: When used by experienced operators, excimer laser coronary artery angioplasty is a well-established therapy that can be used during percutaneous coronary intervention to treat a wide range of coronary lesions including heavily calcified stenosis. Aim: This study sought to analyze the safety and effectiveness of laser angioplasty with the Auryon laser system for the treatment of heavily calcified coronary lesions. Material and methods: A pragmatic sample of 20 patients with heavily calcified stenosis gave informed consent to participate in the study; we evaluated patient characteristics including age, cardiovascular risk factors, angiographic data (lesion complexity, number of stenoses, chronic total occlusion), calcium arch, thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) flow before and after revascularization, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) success, and acute-stent thrombosis. Results: A total of 20 subjects (20 lesions) were enrolled. A successful result, defined as < 30% residual stenosis and TIMI 3 flow after PCI, was achieved in 95% of cases. Conclusions: This study introduced the successful use of this innovative device to treat high calcium and complex epicardial stenosis in 20 patients. The positive impressions include the ease of use and the safety and effectiveness in the treatment of severely calcified lesions.

Indexed as

calcific coronary lesionscomplex percutaneous coronary interventionsexcimer laser coronary atherectomy

Identifiers

PMID40656190
PMCPMC12244346

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.