ArticleUniversal Access in Human-Computer Interaction : 19th International Conference, UAHCI 2025, held as part of the 27th HCI International Conference, HCII 2025, Gothenburg, Sweden, June 22-27, 2025, Proceedings. Part I2025
Evaluating Conformance of Video Safety Tools for Photosensitive Epilepsy.
Article in Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction : 19th International Conference, UAHCI 2025, held as part of the 27th HCI International Conference, HCII 2025, Gothenburg, Sweden, June 22-27, 2025, Proceedings. Part I, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
People with photosensitive epilepsy (PSE) may have seizures caused by flashing lights, particular video sequences, and bold standing patterns. To reduce the risk from video and other content, five international guidelines have been created that outline the characteristics of flashing that can cause harm when taken together: large areas, intense changes, and a range of flash rates. Automated tools can evaluate video sequences according to these standards. However, there are few reference videos available to validate and compare such automated PSE tools. Furthermore, the test videos that have been reported to date do not thoroughly test PSE algorithms' adherence to standards. This article describes some of the gaps in current testing paradigms and proposes additional validation tests for PSE hazard analysis tools. We have also created a new tool that can be used to generate ground-truth video sequences for validating and comparing PSE safety algorithms. This tool can create videos that extend beyond the simple alternating-frames test videos typically used to date. Additionally, more complicated test videos can be generated to test more nuanced characteristics of the standards or to test algorithms' susceptibility to confounding-but-harmless flashing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.