Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40656125›Full record

ArticleNeurology. Clinical practice2025

Promoting Sleep for Neurology Inpatients: The Value of Routine Overnight Vital Signs.

Colin A Ellis, Patrick Z Liu, Alan Napole, Lydia Denison, Noor F Shaik, Grace Anya Venezia, Lovisa Ljungberg, Michael A Karamardian, Colleen Peachey, Michael Buckley and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurology. Clinical practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Let Our Patients Sleep: A Plea for Common Sense.Neurology. Clinical practice · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Colin A EllisDepartment of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2152-8106
Patrick Z LiuPerelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia; and.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9663-8233
Alan NapolePerelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia; and.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-9928-7073
Lydia DenisonDepartment of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-8776-7385
Noor F ShaikDepartment of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9336-4238
Grace Anya VeneziaDepartment of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Lovisa LjungbergDepartment of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-2435-1481
Michael A KaramardianPerelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia; and.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-5417-0980
Colleen PeacheyHospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-6561-443X
Michael BuckleyHospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-1925-7582
Charles J BaeDepartment of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2991-0617
Laura SteinDepartment of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Denise J XuDepartment of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-1327-3269

Funding

Polygenic risk in familial epilepsyK23NS121520 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI ELLIS, COLIN · 2021 to 2025
$1.1M
NINDS NIH HHS K23 NS121520
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Sleep is a critical component of health and recovery. Awakening sleeping patients for routine vital sign monitoring overnight is a common inpatient practice, but its benefits are uncertain. This study asked 3 questions: (1) How often are routine overnight vital signs abnormal? (2) How often are those abnormal vital signs clinically actionable? (3) Are there patients who may not need routine overnight vital sign monitoring? Methods: We analyzed observational retrospective data extracted from electronic health records of patients admitted to inpatient neurology floors at our institution between 2017 and 2024. We defined routine vital signs as collected by nursing assistants at least 3 hours apart. The outcome measure was an urgent clinical action (stat orders, rapid responses, or transfers to a higher level of care) within 1 hour of vital sign events. We compared the rate of urgent clinical actions after abnormal vital signs with the base rate of those events after normal vital signs. Statistical analysis used generalized estimating equations to account for repeated measures. Results: We analyzed 102,184 routine vital sign events from 5,569 neurology admissions. In total, 9% of vital sign events were abnormal. The likelihood of urgent clinical actions increased after abnormal vital sign events, compared with after normal vital sign events during the day (4.3% vs 2.4%, odds ratio (OR) 1.8 [1.6-2.1]); at night (2.4% vs 0.9%, OR 2.8 [2.2-3.7]); during the night in low-risk patients with normal daytime vitals (2.0% vs 0.7%, OR 3.0 [1.8-4.9]); and at night in high-risk patients with abnormal daytime vitals (2.6% vs 1.1%, OR 2.5 [1.7-3.6]). The number needed to treat (NNT), i.e., the number of vital sign events needed to initiate 1 extra urgent clinical action above the base rate, was 1,856 [943; 4,598] in low-risk patients. The NNT for low-risk stroke patients was 1,570 [679; 4,707] and for general neurology patients was 2,231 [797; 5,423]. Discussion: Urgent clinical actions attributable to abnormal routine vital signs were uncommon in neurology inpatients, especially overnight in patients with normal daytime vital signs. Determining the risks and benefits of routine overnight vital sign monitoring will help hospitals and health care providers move toward more patient-centered inpatient neurologic care.

Identifiers

PMID40656125
PMCPMC12253964

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.