Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40656075›Full record

ArticleNeuroscience applied2024

Neural underpinnings of memory encoding and retrieval: Validation of a novel ecologically valid fMRI paradigm.

Katrine Krabbe Thommesen, Viktoria Damgaard, Johanna Mariegaard, Andreas Elleby Jespersen, Alexander Tobias Ysbæk-Nielsen, Christina Mikkelsen, Maria Didriksen, Sisse Rye Ostrowski, Martin Balslev Jørgensen, Julian Macoveanu and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuroscience applied, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Brain organization of a memory champion.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Katrine Krabbe ThommesenNeurocognition and Emotion in Affective Disorders (NEAD) Centre, Psychiatric Centre Copenhagen, Frederiksberg Hospital, Hovedvejen 17, DK-2000, Frederiksberg, Denmark.
Viktoria DamgaardNeurocognition and Emotion in Affective Disorders (NEAD) Centre, Psychiatric Centre Copenhagen, Frederiksberg Hospital, Hovedvejen 17, DK-2000, Frederiksberg, Denmark.
Johanna MariegaardNeurocognition and Emotion in Affective Disorders (NEAD) Centre, Psychiatric Centre Copenhagen, Frederiksberg Hospital, Hovedvejen 17, DK-2000, Frederiksberg, Denmark.
Andreas Elleby JespersenNeurocognition and Emotion in Affective Disorders (NEAD) Centre, Psychiatric Centre Copenhagen, Frederiksberg Hospital, Hovedvejen 17, DK-2000, Frederiksberg, Denmark.
Alexander Tobias Ysbæk-NielsenDepartment of Psychology, University of Copenhagen, Øster Farimagsgade 2A, DK-1353, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Christina MikkelsenDepartment of Clinical Immunology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, DK-2100, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Maria DidriksenDepartment of Clinical Immunology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, DK-2100, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Sisse Rye OstrowskiDepartment of Clinical Immunology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, DK-2100, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Martin Balslev JørgensenDepartment of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 3B, DK-2200, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Julian MacoveanuNeurocognition and Emotion in Affective Disorders (NEAD) Centre, Psychiatric Centre Copenhagen, Frederiksberg Hospital, Hovedvejen 17, DK-2000, Frederiksberg, Denmark.
Kamilla Woznica MiskowiakNeurocognition and Emotion in Affective Disorders (NEAD) Centre, Psychiatric Centre Copenhagen, Frederiksberg Hospital, Hovedvejen 17, DK-2000, Frederiksberg, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cognitive impairment is prevalent in affective disorders. Currently, there is a lack of effective treatment options, which is partly due to limited insight into their neural underpinnings and poor transfer to everyday life. Integrating neuroimaging measures in cognition trials to identify neurocircuitry biomarkers is crucial for treatment development. We pooled baseline data from two clinical trials to validate a novel functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) paradigm simulating real-life verbal learning and memory tasks. Healthy participants with no psychiatric history (n = 34) underwent fMRI and an ecologically valid virtual reality-based verbal memory task. During fMRI, they performed an ecologically valid paradigm involving encoding and recognition of a grocery shopping list. Whole-brain analyses assessed task-related activation in key neural networks. Neural underpinnings of memory encoding involved the hippocampus, prefrontal, temporal, occipital, and parietal regions, and caudate. Recognition task activation encompassed a network of frontal, parietal, temporal, and occipital regions. Positive associations were found between encoding-related activity in the inferior temporal gyrus and lateral occipital cortex and the number of correctly recalled grocery items. This study introduces and validates a novel fMRI paradigm for assessing real-life verbal learning and memory abilities. The identified neural underpinnings highlight the involvement of diverse brain regions in encoding and recognition processes that may be implemented in future investigations of the neural correlates of memory impairment and improvement.

Indexed as

Affective disordersCognitionEcological validityfMRIMemoryVerbal learning

Identifiers

PMID40656075
PMCPMC12243977

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.